Hello every body… Sorry for my poor english !
I would like to tell about my country “France” from which government people try to give lessons to other countries about human rights, justice or even humanity and democracy.
You can read on my blog « je-balance-tout.com ». How I have been treated by the judges after having served during 42 years as a military.
France is a country of scammers. I mean so about justice overall.
Following the very French injustices, we should form a union made up of all the litigants who have dealt with unfair judgments.
I am telling you here the story of a scandalous case in 2006 concerning a German company named AKZENTA for which I was sentenced to the maximum without any evidence but only with the fallacious allegations of the french judge.
This shows how filled with hatred some judges are with regard to certain litigants whom they take in flu from the beginning of their business. Well protected by the high council of magistrates they take all rights including the right to « kill ». They are « heart amputees ». A period as a lawyer (like in other countries) before taking office will allow them to acquire a little humanity by rubbing shoulders with the litigants whom they should defend.
It is easy to make sentences, comfortably seated in a beautiful leather armchair.
It is a reflection of our society … « The hate »
To illustrate my story, let me remind you a phrase from Mrs. Eleanor ROOSEVELT, wife of the former President of the United States, who said: « Don’t look down to people ». Which means, « don’t take people from high. » Only the great chefs apply it. I have been able to rub shoulders with them (great leaders) during my long military career (42 years in total) and they all have my recognition.
Mr. Macron too would do well to take it from seed since he easily despises. The same is true for Mr. Hollande. Nothing should be expected from Macron to take courageous measures of justice in our country.
My complaints about the maximum sentence imposed on me reflect the fact that political and judicial bodies have been « taken from above » because no response has been given to these complaints. One has the impression that in France only violence and blood are of interest. Proof in the text.
The Superior Council of Magistrates opposes the 1958 constitution according to which a judge cannot be punished for his faults.
Even the Human Rights League considers that having a fair trial is not a fundamental right. The declaration of human rights does not protect citizens. Who is the rule of law for?
Finally, when we address these French elites (politicians, magistrates, etc.), we are talking to a wall. This is the difference with the German political authorities which respond to letters, positively or negatively and in a short time.
It’s criminal delinquency.
As many military like me I have signed the code of honor. It is not the case with some judges.
I’m not used to asking for financial support I would be too much ashamed of it but now I want to continue my fight which is impossible without a minimum of money. So, if you are in love with real justice just go to my PayPal account: PayPal.Me/gbrucel
The activity of the German company AKZENTA lasted 11 years (from 1995 to 2006).
– It was flourishing over the entire period and the investors’ contracts were decked out with VAT as soon as they were signed, being commercial contracts. Subscribers were therefore considered to be end customers in the same way as any commercial purchase (invoices from Mr. FASQUEL brought to the file by himself or his lawyer).
– In 2004, I signed 2 contracts for participation in the turnover of this company with the promise of a monthly return of payment calculated on the basis of my purchase for 10 years minimum. It is true that, like the investors, I had placed my trust in this company because the taxman levied the VAT on the amounts invested from the subscription. In this way he was certain to see this tax paid upstream. A VAT invoice was sent to each investor.
– At the end of 2005, during 2 periods of military reserve on the base of CREIL, I accidentally meet Mr. FASQUEL, former work colleague on duty on this base, and speaks to him, among other things, about my contracts.
(Being myself a partner after having contracted 2 times, I was an intermediary to have other contracts signed for the company AKZENTA).
– Immediately interested, he wants to take out a contract worth around € 5,500, then a second of € 26,000 during my other military reserve period at Creil in December 2005. Then a third of € 31,500 on the occasion of his came to meet me in Alsace (contract signed at Kehl). The cumulative amounts of VAT on his contracts were € 8,704. This indicates a fierce desire to sign these contracts despite the risk noted on the general conditions according to which there will be no payment in the event of zero turnover.
– In his judgment, the judge recognized the displacement of Mr. FASQUEL (nearly 1000 km) when he came in Alsace but nevertheless opposed a financial canvassing. He is very strong you see!!
– The liquidator of the company wrote me a letter on June 15, 2016 which said that they were working for the refund of the VAT without my intervention. No effect followed since that date.
– My letters to Ms MERKEL and to the VAT center in BONN did not receive a positive response. It should be noted that the Germans even respond negatively, unlike the French political authorities, which ignore you completely.
– Following the shutdown of the company in May 2006 and the imprisonment of the directors, I lost all of my investments and those of Mr. FASQUEL and Mrs. RUFFENACH as well.
During the year 2009, Maître Oliver BERG, lawyer in Strasbourg (at the time) issues an extra-judicial mandate aiming to allow the restitution of the sums invested with the company with 20% of the sums recovered for his personal profit. I initiate a file (which was refused by him) and, to be honest, warned Mr. FASQUEL that he can address this lawyer. A stick to make me beat since this lawyer turned against me to bring me to justice in January 2010. By letter, he asked me to fully reimburse FASQUEL of the sums invested as well as the corresponding VAT (with 20% for his personal account , of course). We understand the doggedness of this lawyer afterwards because I was not inclined to reimburse sums that I did not collect myself.
– The judgment of February 27, 2012 dismisses this lawyer and his client (FASQUEL) considering that I was not responsible for this debacle in particular with regard to my own lost investments and the production of documents at the national level disseminated by the company.
– So there then!! … unleashing and abuse of authority. Insults, discrimination, defamation, intentional trials, and so on.
Assigned on appeal, as these contracts were established through me, Judge LIEBER baptized me adviser and financial marketer, took part for FASQUEL despite the facts stated above, and condemned me to the maximum penalty, that is the full reimbursement of the sums invested to the company AKZENTA, with VAT + legal interest + 5000 € (art 700), the whole corresponding to the sum of 72 232 € (by bailiff). All from my own accounts
The date of the appeal trial on February 14, 2014 has been also hidden to me in order to avoid my presence. Which is however a fundamental right. Conspiracy?
The various letters to the Presidents of the Republic, Ministers of Justice, General Inspector of Justice, Prosecutors, have received no response. The Superior Council of Magistracy recognizes my grievances but opposes an article of the 1958 constitution and dismisses me. The judges are well protected. They have the license to psychologically kill or massacre honest citizens and their families.
Thus, it is very easy for a judge to convict with fallacious allegations like baptizing me as a financial adviser and direct seller, to ignore the evidence that it was a commercial activity, and thus to oppose the monetary and financial code.
In addition, he completely disregarded all the evidence presented to exonerate me (at trial, the first judge took it into account). He unreservedly follows the precepts of Oswald BAUDOT of the magistrates’ union according to which they must tip the scales on one side according to their ideology.
This is a mini “DREYFUS” case. This is unrelenting relentlessness which I oppose and will fiercely oppose for the rest of my life because I cannot imagine such a judicial sneak led by predatory judges.
The accusations: To support his theses, judge LIEBER is content to baptize me « financial advisor » without any proof. Besides, it is only based on falsified and misappropriated documents by the opposing party.
It is indeed a commercial activity to whose contracts were taxed by the VAT at their opening (attached invoices).
What prompted some guys to buy contracts from this AKZENTA company?
It’s trust in this company whose government levied VAT on all investor contracts. This proved that this company was controlled by the tax authorities. And it was during the entire period of activity from 1995 to 2006 (11 years). During all these years, there was never any question of countering this activity which happened to be legal.
On June 15, 2016, the liquidator of the AKZENTA company, Me BIERBACH, wrote to tell me about a possible reimbursement of the German VAT applied on my contracts and those of Mr. FASQUEL among others. This VAT has still not been reimbursed to date, even though the judgment included it in my conviction. Unacceptable!! This proves that it was a commercial activity and not a financial investment as claimed and hammered by the judge.
Various written testimonies have shown that I have not approached the few investors who can be counted on the fingers of one hand. All were relatives, friends or colleagues except Ms. RUFFENACH (also complainant) who had my contact details through her friend, who was my office colleague, and who offered me an appointment at her office.
The Human Rights League:
I agree with the words of Eric ZEMMOUR (French journalist) who underlines that France, if it is the country of the declaration of human rights, is not the country of human rights.
Following my letter, the League considers that the right to be tried fairly is not a fundamental right. Well done!
As in the Dreyfus case, the judge hangs a label on my back which will be read by supporters of the injustice. In fact, when you want to condemn someone you just have to label them to feed the subsidized media.
One day a lawyer said to me, « Judges hate financial advisers. » I now understand why they put this label on me, to better condemn me.
A judge has all the rights: to violate laws and regulations, to tip the scales towards one or the other of the parties and to sentence to the maximum punishment according to his choice without taking into account the evidence contrary to his judgment. But his feeling is not proof.
He even went so far as to oblige me to reimburse the complainants for the VAT that had been collected by the German government, it is very strong !!
I DON’T KNOW WHO WILL READ THIS TEXT BUT I HOPE THAT THE INDIGNATION WILL MAKE THEM REACT.
I would like to continue my fight about this injustice but I have no money left to pay another lawyer.